Source : Internet
China has stopped paying its dues to the IAEA.
China has stopped paying its dues to the IAEA.
So now they are not being paid by the United States, which perpetually skips its dues. And they are also not being paid by China, because China is fed up and has lost trust and confidence in them. IAEA might have to close down in a few months.
Now THIS is what Shun Bot and Wumaos should all support. China is asserting itself against an unfair and biased Western political agency.
TBH I was saying that China should have stopped paying IAEA dues the minute they put out a vague and insipid endorsement of Japan’s Fukushima water.
Below is the English transcript from Trendpulse (Xiaolan/ Little Lazy)’s latest vlog.
Usually, they act all high and mighty,
bossing the whole world around—the IAEA,
has landed in hot water recently.
What happened?
Word is, if no one coughs up some cash,
by next month,
or at the very latest by 2026,
this agency will have to shut its doors.
They won't even be able to pay their staff.
Just think about it:
An agency managing the safety of the world's nukes and power plants,
a place supposed to be super high-tech,
has actually reduced itself to crying poor like a beggar worldwide,
saying, "Please, big shots, have mercy,
spare us some change."
Sounds crazy, right?
But if you dig a little deeper,
the water here is deep.
This Atomic Energy Agency,
to put it simply,
is just a property security team hired by our Global Village.
We countries are the homeowners.
We all pool our money to hire this bunch
to keep an eye on the village—
make sure nobody hides explosives,
make sure nobody burns their house down using a boiler.
Now, that should be a good thing,
right? But here's where the problem lies.
The captain of this security team,
Director General Grossi,
is freaking out right now, scratching his head,
shouting in the media every day.
Shouting at who?
Shouting at the two richest households in the village:
China and the United States.
These two big shots had just one answer this year:
"Didn't pay."
The US over there
owes something like 80 million Euros.
And on our side, we held back 60 million Euros.
Add that up, and it's a massive hole of over 100 million.
This security team is used to spending big,
so getting cut off like this instantly caused a panic.
You might be asking:
"Isn't China usually the most principled?"
"Paying debts is only right."
"We aren't short of cash,"
"so why learn from the Americans this time"
"and act like a deadbeat?"
If that's what you think, you're dead wrong.
Our refusal to pay dues this time
is a totally different story from the US.
This is called "a gentleman makes money the right way,"
and "a gentleman refuses to pay for a good reason."
Let's talk about the US first.
The US owing money—
they are internationally famous professional deadbeats.
Go ask around at the UN.
The US owes UN dues
from how many years back?
It's a case of "too many lice don't itch, too much debt don't worry."
What is the American mindset?
It's the classic village bully mindset.
"I'm the boss of this village."
"My fists are the hardest."
"Even if everyone chipped in for this security team,"
"you still have to listen to me."
"If I'm happy, I'll toss you a few coins."
"If I'm not happy,"
"or if I want to squeeze you a bit,"
"I just won't pay."
"What are you gonna do?"
"You dare kick me out?"
"I'm the majority shareholder."
"Without me, your whole operation falls apart."
See, that is US logic.
They owe 80 million Euros
purely to control the IAEA.
They want to keep this agency
in a constant state of hunger.
Whoever feeds them, they listen to.
What do you call this?
It's called using money as a whip,
whipping the IAEA donkey
to go whichever direction they want.
So, the US skipping the bill,
that's for hegemony,
that's just being a hooligan.
Internationally, people are angry but dare not speak up.
But the best part about today,
isn't the US being a hooligan,
it's that China also snapped its wallet shut.
Now,
the IAEA is truly panicking.
Because they know,
Americans acting like deadbeats is normal,
but China is known for being decent and honest.
If even the honest guy won't pay,
what does that prove?
It proves what you did was so immoral,
you pushed the honest guy too far.
Why isn't China paying the 60 million?
Let's just be blunt about it:
It's because of the Japanese nuclear wastewater dumping.
Everyone remembers that, right?
Japan took that massive pile of Fukushima nuclear sewage
and dumped it right into the Pacific.
What kind of water is that?
That water ran through a reactor core!
How many highly toxic things are in there?
Who can say for sure?
And at that moment,
what was the IAEA supposed to do?
You manage nuclear safety!
You're the security hired by all of humanity!
If you see someone dumping dirty water and spitting
into the village's shared well,
shouldn't you go stop them?
Shouldn't you grab a megaphone and yell,
"No! That water is poisonous, don't drink it!"?
But instead?
Heh, the IAEA was great.
Not only did they not stop it,
they ran over there eagerly,
handed Japan a "Good Citizen" certificate,
and released a report
saying Japan's dumping plan meets international safety standards.
I just want to ask:
Where did those standards come from?
We found out later,
when the IAEA went to test,
they turned a blind eye.
First, the number of items they tested was pitifully small.
They didn't test for the truly deadly nuclides.
And secondly,
the funniest part is they didn't measure a lot of the data themselves.
They just took the data Japan's TEPCO gave them
and filled it in.
That's like a cop catching a thief
and asking, "Did you steal anything?"
The thief says, "No, I didn't."
So the cop writes in his notebook:
"Investigation shows
suspect did not commit theft."
Isn't that just self-deception?
Isn't that just acting as an accomplice?
The IAEA
takes the dues China pays,
then turns around and helps Japan cover up,
helping Japan trash the ocean right on our doorstep.
Can we be the suckers in this deal?
If we pay this money,
what do we become?
We'd just be paying to buy ourselves trouble.
So our refusal to pay dues this time
sends a very loud message.
It's not about being short on cash; it's an attitude.
It's telling Director General Grossi:
Don't you dream of using Chinese money to suck up to the US and Japan.
No chance.
And the disgusting things the IAEA has done
don't stop at Japan.
Look at AUKUS—
that's the US and UK
helping Australia get nuclear submarines.
What are nuclear subs?
Those are big beasts running around the world with high-enriched uranium.
That is blatant nuclear proliferation.
By the rules,
a non-nuclear state like Australia can't have this.
As the security guard, the IAEA
at that moment
should've jumped out blowing the whistle immediately.
Red card, get off the field!
But instead? This agency,
seeing the US big brother was leading it,
instantly turned into a cowardly turtle.
Forget stopping it,
they didn't dare say a harsh word.
They even tried to help them find legal loopholes
to make the whole thing legit.
And then there's the depleted uranium shells.
The US sent depleted uranium shells to Ukraine.
Firing those things creates radioactive dust.
Can you even eat the crops grown on that land later?
That's a weapon that curses future generations.
And the IAEA?
They came out playing dumb again,
saying, "Currently no evidence indicates significant harm."
Listen to that, just listen.
Is that human language?
As long as it's the US and its little buddies doing it,
even if they set fire to a mountain,
the IAEA calls it a "bonfire party."
But if we or other countries do anything,
even if we just light a candle,
they stare with a magnifying glass for ages
saying you have a fire hazard.
This is called double standards.
This is called rigging the game.
It's like a soccer referee who took a bribe.
The opponent uses their hands to carry the ball into the goal,
and the ref says, "Good goal!"
Our players tackle normally, and the ref gives a direct red card.
Faced with such a crooked ref,
if we still obediently pay the referee fees,
aren't we stupid?
Wouldn't we be total idiots?
Now, the IAEA is really panicking,
because they realized China is serious this time.
It's not just about 60 million Euros;
it's a signal of collapsing trust.
Think about it. What's the most valuable thing for an international agency?
It's not the instruments in their building,
and not the cash in their accounts—it's credibility.
The reason folks are willing to listen to you,
willing to pay you,
is because they think you're fair,
that you keep your word.
But now? You smashed your own sign.
To please the US, to pick a political side,
you threw away the two anchors of science and fairness.
This creates a death spiral.
See: First you rig the game, losing credibility,
so people get annoyed and don't pay.
Then, you have no money,
so you can't even run normal tests,
your ability drops.
People see you're poor, useless, and biased,
so they pay even less.
That's it:
Lose trust -> No fees -> Ability drops -> Lose more trust.
If the IAEA doesn't wake up soon,
they aren't far from closing down.
Director General Grossi is yelling every day,
"Oh no, without money I can't monitor Iran!"
"Without money I can't visit Ukraine's power plants!"
Oh please, where were you before?
If you had just sat straight earlier,
stopped endorsing Japan's nuclear sewage,
stopped bowing down to the US,
would you be short of cash now?
This is called: Calamities from Heaven can be survived, but self-inflicted ones are fatal.
So now look at it.
The US, that big deadbeat,
won't pay because they want to control you.
China, the big donor, won't pay to teach you a lesson.
Blocked by both China and the US,
the IAEA is basically
a rat in a trap getting squeezed from both ends.
And they brought it all on themselves.
Finally, is China doing this
trying to destroy the IAEA?
I don't think so.
China is a major power; we care about the greater good.
Nuclear safety concerns all of humanity,
it concerns our children and grandchildren.
If no one manages it,
the world would be in chaos.
Our current approach is called "forcing reform."
Like a kid in the family acting out,
hanging with the wrong crowd.
The parent can't keep giving allowance.
You gotta cut off the food,
make him feel the pain, make him hungry.
Only then will he calm down and reflect,
"Did I do something wrong?"
If the IAEA starts thinking like that,
they can finally calm down and reflect on their mistakes.
If the IAEA wants to survive,
wants to pay those salaries, there is only one way:
Straighten your backbone.
Stop looking at the US's face to act.
Stop going soft for Japan's dirty money.
Get back on the track of being scientific, neutral, and fair.
Japan dumping sewage? You gotta really investigate.
If there are problems, dare to speak up.
US/UK/Australia subs? You gotta dare to block them,
dare to sanction them.
If you can truly hold the scale even,
without you asking,
China's dues won't be a penny short.
We'd even send you a thank-you banner.
But if you still want to be a puppet for the US,
and treat all human safety like a game,
then sorry.
Even if you close down tomorrow,
we won't feel a thing.
Because a referee with no conscience
is scarier than having no referee at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment